miércoles, 3 de septiembre de 2025

The logic of twisted Republican logistics

K.C. 

As the state of Florida announces that it plans to end all vaccine mandates, I have to say that I do not understand the Republican party’s (and especially Robert F. Kennedy’s) rejection of immunizations. We need to ask:

a)      Is it just a political stunt or do they believe it? Has RFK been vaccinated himself, against, say, measles or COVID? Have his children been vaccinated?

b)     If it’s a political stunt, what -in heaven’s name- do they want to accomplish?

One can imagine them all bunched up in a political huddle, asking, what big, black flag can we raise to scare the -already terrified- white, male voters? It would have to be a flag that will leave the functionaries themselves more or less unscathed. It is interesting than none of them seem to have fallen ill with one of these preventable diseases. So maybe, yes, in secret, they are all protected. Or perhaps, they are thinking that by now the risk of  contagion has diminished.

But then, if an epidemic were to occur, these white/male voters’ children will be vulnerable, too, along with the other multi-tinted kids. When Trump´s and RFK’s supporters’ children get sick and die, what benefits do these Republicans see for their party?

Then, on the other hand, they talk about schemes for increasing the national birth rate. One supposes that this, also, is a call-out to their followers who are worried by the increasing demographics among the non-white, non-fundamentalist, Christian voters. But it’s contradictory to be both killing off their supporters’ descendants with diseases, and at the same time, increasing their birthrates.

Can anyone explain this?

 
Locations of visitors to this page